Subscribe

Your email:

Connect with Beretta

Beretta Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Impossible Expectations in Firearms Use – Part 1

 

Impossible Expectations for Law Enforcement and Armed Citizens – Part 1

Use of firearms for defense

Whenever a law enforcement officer uses deadly force in self-defense or defense of others, there is a segment of the population that criticizes that force. This is based on a lack of understanding of law enforcement officers’ training and skills under stress. These unrealistic expectations are not consistent with legal decisions and only serve to further separate the police from the citizens they serve. As concealed carry continues to gain popularity, armed citizens should be concerned over these impossible expectations that misled individuals would like applied to law enforcement officers… because someday it may be applied to them.

Officers do not start their tour of duty hoping to be involved in any life or death situation. The physical, legal and mental ramifications are too great. The truth is police officers react to situations to which they are sent to or come across during their shift. They do not control the time or location of the encounter, nor the words or actions of the people they encounter. Officers have a legal responsibility to protect others from violence, regardless of the personal danger involved. Many times they neither have the luxury, nor the obligation, of non-performance of their duties.


Some of the most ridiculous expectations suggested for law enforcement response to deadly force encounters include:

  • Recognizing a real gun from a fake

  • Prohibiting the shooting of an unarmed subject

  • Knowing if there is a bullet in the suspect’s chamber

  • Shooting threats in their extremities

  • Deadly force should only be used when law enforcement officers are threatened with a firearm

  • Deadly force should not be used against pregnant women or children

Understanding police training and court decisions help explain why these expectations are impractical, impossible, and dangerous to implement… for anyone.

Graham v. Connor recognizes that officers react in situations that are, ‘tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving.’ Additionally, they recognize that the nature of law enforcement, requires officers to make, ‘split-second decisions… without the benefit of hindsight 20/20.’ This means that any information discovered after the fact cannot be applied retroactively to any situation.

Expectation #1 – Recognizing a Real Gun From a Fake One

It is impossible to identify a real gun from a fake one under stress.  Citizens constantly call inHow do you recognize a fake gun? complaints of armed subjects. There are air soft and pellet guns available for almost every make and model firearm. They are very realistic and although air soft is supposed to be recognizable by the orange safety tip on the muzzle, its common for individuals to color the tips with a black marker, to wrap it with electrical tape, or to break the tips off completely. It’s tragic when someone is shot when armed with a toy but it’s unreasonable to place that burden on the officer or armed citizen.

 

 

Expectation #2 – Prohibiting the Shooting of an Unarmed Subject

Unarmed people are killed more than is publicized. It is a hard pill for people to swallow when they have never experienced such a situation. It is easy to ‘Monday morning quarterback” others who use deadly force. It is astonishing when outsiders criticize others’ actions by employing 20/20 hindsight and without a threat to their personal safety. Unarmed subjects can quickly become ‘armed’ through the use of atypical and environmental weapons. Many deaths occur every year from blunt force trauma and strangulation. Objects like, sticks, rocks, walls, cement, automobiles, and fists can cause blunt force trauma, which leads to death or serious injury. The fact is that no one is ever truly ‘unarmed.’

When an officer faces a threat there are circumstances when it is appropriate for them to discharge their firearms. One such situation may be a furtive movement that would lead a ‘reasonable officer or person’ to believe their life is endangered. Subjects who pretend to be armed sometimes threaten officers. An officer is not expected to wait and see if a subject is bluffing. If they do, it may be too late.

A firearm is not the only weapon that constitutes a deadly weapon. Any object that could be used to cause death or great bodily harm can rise to the level of deadly force (eg: a knife, a hammer, or a nail gun) The criteria for meeting this standard is that the victim must be in fear of losing their life and that other similarly-situated individuals would also reasonably believe that the victim's conclusion and analysis were correct. An average person's stamina in a physical encounter is between 45 seconds to a minute. After that, stamina runs short and a variety of physiological changes begin to occur. These changes include loss of dexterity, tunnel vision, and ultimately, loss of conciousness. A person is close to losing conciousness when their peripheral vision deteriorates to the point that there is a sensation of "walls closing in." It is important to recognize that deadly force isn't simply the result of someone brandishing a firearm: many other objects within the enviroment rise to the level of deadly force. These objects can, and have, caused death or great bodily harm.

 

(This is part 1 of a series that will continue. Join our blog, to know when the next installment is published.)

Make sure you follow Beretta on FacebookTwitter or YouTube

 

This post and its contents are the views and opinions of the author only, and do not necessarily represent Beretta.

Comments

Great article, but unfortunately most of the people who read this know better. Why cant the media and liberal lawmakers see this.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:49 PM by Michael Longfellow
I know those on this website are probably like-minded people but my hope is that when the average person tries to understand similar situations they can search and find this information. Also... as a mother if a child who is a huge collector or air soft guns and armament I hope that other parents who are similarly situated will recognize there are inherent dangers should their kids are in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's best to explain to children that the police cannot always determine a real gun from a fake one and explain some best practices if stopped by the police... hopefully through that sort if conversation a tragedy can be averted.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 07, 2013 4:08 PM by Sara Ahrens
I am glad that you are covering this, as police are just that, human, and can only function as such. With that said, are 'armed citizen' held to that standard after say, taking a Concealed Carry Class?  
As each of us, responsible armed citizens train with our weapon systems and become more efficient, when are we held to the standards as the police? or are we expected, once the decision is made to purchase a weapon, to be in that class of the Uniformed Officer? 
Keep up the series, this helps us average citizens get a blanket understanding of how we react and are scrutinized under.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 07, 2013 7:59 PM by Dwarftoad
Dwarftoad- armed citizens are not treated under the same scrutiny as the police because the two groups have two vary different purposes. Police officers are expected to protect themselves and others. They do not generally have the luxury to decide when and if to use force. It would be absurd for an armed citizen to be held to the same standard when the initial training to become sworn is +400 hours. That's just basic training not ojt and updates and certifications and regular qualifications. Police have to respond when called and handle a variety of situations that necessarily require them to intervene, whereas the armed citizen can decide when and where to go out in public. Because of this requirement to respond there is more latitude (I can hear the booing) by the courts for police officers who are forced to make quick decisions. Truthfully, anyone who carries concealed and only goes to a 4-,8-,16- hour training probably shouldn't carry because there is so much at stake if a mistake occurs. With that little training errors are sure to happen. This is over-simplifying but the long of the short of it for the armed citizen is that the most important criteria that must be met at the moment deadly force is used is that the user is in fear for their life or someone else's....That's the only true justification for using deadly force.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:29 PM by Sara Ahrens
Excellent article.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:47 PM by D McKittrick
My comment is that if there is a dispute and you have a CCW you must keep a level head and not get caught up in the moment do not verbally provoke any act of violence . But keep an eye moving at all time's . Every situation is different don't be distracted by other movement's watch them but don't be distracted by them . You must see what other's do not see , example is he right or left handed . is he wearing ring's , has he got dog tag's , doe's he have a boot knife , ect. the list goes on . BE PREPARED .  
Posted @ Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:11 PM by Thomas Davis
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics